Head and Neck Cancer

PV QA 2 - Poster Viewing Q&A 2

MO_35_2824 - Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Updated Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Trials.

Monday, October 22
10:45 AM - 12:15 PM
Location: Innovation Hub, Exhibit Hall 3

Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Updated Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Trials.
T. H. Tan1, Y. Y. Soon2, T. Cheo1, J. Tey2, and I. W. Tham2; 1National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 2National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Purpose/Objective(s): To determine the benefits of adding induction chemotherapy (IC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC).

Materials/Methods: We searched various biomedical databases for randomized trials (RCTs) comparing IC plus CCRT versus (vs) CCRT alone in LANPC. The four outcomes of interests were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). We assessed the quality of the summarized evidence using the GRADE approach. We performed the meta-analysis with a random effects model. We used meta-regression to determine if there is an effect modification on the association between IC and the four outcomes of interest by pre-specified factors (age, gender, T4 stage of disease, N2 or N3 stage of disease, region where the trial was conducted (Asia vs non-Asia), use of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil and use of intensity modulated radiotherapy).

Results: We found six eligible randomized trials with no significant methodological bias including 1415 patients. Adding induction chemotherapy improved OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.771, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.601-0.988, P-value (P) = 0.037, I-squared (I2) = 3.3%), PFS (HR 0.688, 95% CI 0.567-0.836, P < 0.0001, I2= 0%), LRPFS (HR 0.656, 95% CI 0.450-0.956, P = 0.028, I2 = 0%) and DMFS (HR 0.627, 95% CI 0.475-0.829, P = 0.001, I2 = 0%). The quality of summarized evidence was high. Meta-regression did not demonstrate any effect modification on the association between IC and the four outcomes of interest by the prespecified factors.

Conclusion: Adding IC to CCRT significantly improved overall survival and reduced both locoregional and distant disease recurrence for LANPC. We did not identify any factors that has an effect modification on the association between IC and the outcomes of interest.

Author Disclosure: T. Tan: None. Y. Soon: None. I.W. Tham: None.

Send Email for Teng Hwee Tan


Assets

MO_35_2824 - Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Updated Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Trials.



Attendees who have favorited this

Please enter your access key

The asset you are trying to access is locked. Please enter your access key to unlock.

Send Email for Induction Chemotherapy Plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Updated Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Trials.