Radiation Physics

PV QA 3 - Poster Viewing Q&A 3

TU_2_3136 - The Potential Failure Risk of CBCT-Derived PTV Margin Definition: From a Prospective Single-Institutional Hybrid Analysis For Prostate Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

Tuesday, October 23
1:00 PM - 2:30 PM
Location: Innovation Hub, Exhibit Hall 3

The Potential Failure Risk of CBCT-Derived PTV Margin Definition: From a Prospective Single-Institutional Hybrid Analysis For Prostate Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
K. Hirose1, M. Sato2, Y. Hatayama2, H. Kawaguchi2, F. Komai3, I. Fujioka2, M. Tanaka2, K. Ichise2, Y. Takai1, and M. Aoki2; 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku BNCT Research Center, Koriyama, Japan, 2Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan, 3Hirosaki University Hospital, Hirosaki, Japan

Purpose/Objective(s): To describe the impact of markerless on-board kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based positioning uncertainty on determination of PTV margin by comparison with kV orthogonal portal images with gold fiducial markers (FMs), and to validate a methodology of evaluation of PTV margins for markerless kV CBCT according to each institutional limitation in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Materials/Methods: A total of 1177 pre- and 1177 post-treatment kV-OBI and 1177 pre- and 206 post-treatment kV-CBCT images were analyzed in 25 patients who received prostate IGRT with daily localization by implanted FMs. Intrafractional motion of the prostate was evaluated between each pre- and post-treatment image with these two different techniques. The differences in prostate deviations and intrafractional motions between matching by FM in kV-OBI (OBI-FM) and matching by soft tissues in kV-CBCT (CBCT-ST) were compared by Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Compensated PTV margins were determined and compensated by references.

Results: Mean differences between OBI-FM and CBCT-ST in the anterior to posterior (AP), superior to inferior (SI), and left to right (LR) directions were -0.43 ± 1.45, -0.09 ± 1.65, and -0.12 ± 0.80 mm, respectively, with R² = 0.85, 0.88, and 0.83, respectively. Intrafractional motions obtained from CBCT-ST were 0.00 ± 1.46, 0.02 ± 1.49, and 0.15 ± 0.64 mm, respectively, which were smaller than the results from OBI-FM, with 0.43 ± 1.90, 0.12 ± 1.98, and 0.26 ± 0.80 mm, respectively, with R² = 0.42, 0.33, and 0.16, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed a significant proportional bias. PTV margins of 1.5 mm, 1.4 mm, and 0.9 mm for CBCT-ST were calculated from the values of CBCT-ST, which were also smaller than the values of 3.15 mm, 3.66 mm, and 1.60 mm from OBI-FM. The practical PTV margin for CBCT-ST was compensated with the values from OBI-FM as 4.1 mm, 4.8 mm, and 2.2 mm.

Conclusion: PTV margins calculated from CBCT-ST might be underestimated compared to the true PTV margins. To determine a reliable CBCT-ST-based PTV margin, at least the systemic error S and the random error σ for on-line matching errors need to be investigated by supportive preliminary FM evaluation at least once.

Author Disclosure: K. Hirose: Research Grant; Stella pharma. M. Sato: None. Y. Hatayama: None. H. Kawaguchi: None. F. Komai: None. I. Fujioka: None. M. Tanaka: None.

Send Email for Katsumi Hirose


Assets

TU_2_3136 - The Potential Failure Risk of CBCT-Derived PTV Margin Definition: From a Prospective Single-Institutional Hybrid Analysis For Prostate Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy



Attendees who have favorited this

Please enter your access key

The asset you are trying to access is locked. Please enter your access key to unlock.

Send Email for The Potential Failure Risk of CBCT-Derived PTV Margin Definition: From a Prospective Single-Institutional Hybrid Analysis For Prostate Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy